Home Event Info Agenda Registration Media Info Research Partners Follow-up CiD Espanol Francais English Submit A Case Story Submit An Image Submit A Video Send An Alert

navigate one-level upwards Collapse all open topics Explorer

Collapse CisD Knowledge Fair
Expand Top Finalists
Expand View Case Story Entries
Expand View Video Entries
Expand View Image Entries
Collapse Knowledge Fair Overview
Expand Eligibility and guidelines
Expand Focal areas
Expand Incentives
Collapse Judges and Evaluation Criteria
Expand Resources
Search
Translation

Most Visited

ID: 49023
topic

Judges and Evaluation Criteria

Knowledge Fair Reference Group of Judges

Adeboye Adeyemo (African Capacity Building Foundation—ACBF, Zimbabwe) 
Wangu Mwangi (Learning for Development—L4D, the Netherlands)
Alfredo Mazive  (Learning Network on Capacity Development—LenCD, Consultant, Mozambique)
BT Costantinos, (Professor, School of Post Graduate Studies, AAU, Ethiopia)  
Rose Wanjiru (Centre for Economic Governance and AIDS in Africa—CEGAA, Kenya)
Heather Baser (Consultant, Canada) 
Fernando Dick (National Work Group for Participation—GNTP, Bolivia)
Alvaro Caballero (Center of Information and Resources for Development--CIRD, Paraguay)
Tony Land (Consultant, Botswana)
Marc Levy (European Centre for Development Policy Management—ECDPM, the Netherlands)
Aimee Maron (Consultant, Ecuador)
Thomas Theisohn (Learning Network on Capacity Development—LenCD, France)
Jeffrey Kwaterski (The Impact Alliance, USA)
Tsegaye Lemma (United Nations Development Programme - Capacity Development Group)
Jayne Musumba (United Nations Development Programme - Capacity Development Group) 
Alessandra Casazza (United Nations Development Programme - Capacity Development Group) 
Matthew Cummins (United Nations Development Programme - Capacity Development Group)
Hideko Hadzialic (United Nations Development Programme - BDP Poverty Group) 
Angelica Shamerina (United Nations Development Programme - Environment and Energy Group)
Renata Rubian (United Nations Development Programme - BDP Poverty Group)
 
The panel of judges representing subject matter expertise and regional diversity selected finalists from among the entries that best met the evaluation criteria listed below.  Each entry was reviewed and scored using a 10 point scale for each of the four criteria.  A total of 40 points was possible.
 
Knowledge Fair Entry Evaluation Criteria
 
Clarity
  • Does the entry clearly reflect the overall theme of capacity development?
  • Does the entry clearly illustrate how a policy, investment or program worked to develop capacity within at least one of the three thematic contexts (sub-national/local; post-crisis/transitional; middle-income countries
Creativity
  • Does the experience demonstrate an innovative policy, methodology or programmatic approach?
  • Does the entry present the activity or experience in a creative way?
Impact
  • What impact has an investment in capacity development produced?
  • Is there clear evidence provided that the policy, investment or program has made a measurable impact?
Scalability
  • Is the policy, investment or program able to be implemented more broadly in different communities, countries or settings other than the one described in the case story?
  • Does the entry inspire and/or promote replication by others?


powered for social impact by the Impact Alliance